Costain Communications
Click for home Click for pro-wind campaigning Click for single issue campaigning Click for Journalism Click for Green pages Click for Contact

G R E E N   C O L U M N S   F R O M   T H E   I S L E   O F   M A N ' S   E N V I R O N M E N T A L   C O M M E N T A T O R

ffinlo Costain - photo by Tim James - http://www.graygallery.co.uk
2009 Green Columns








Featured (in order below):

     Bullet point DECEMBER - This Christmas, remember the planet
     Bullet point NOVEMBER - A world of a difference
     Bullet point OCTOBER - The tide is turning
     Bullet point SEPTEMBER - Can the tide create a surge in energy
    Bullet point AUGUST - Separating the rainforest from the trees
   
Bullet point JULY - Copenhagen
   
Bullet point JUNE - Let's take a good look at clean coal
   
Bullet point MAY - Britain is not awash with asylum seekers
   
Bullet point APRIL - Could carbon rationing be the answer?
   
Bullet point MARCH - Snow, waste and ManxTube
   
Bullet point FEBRUARY - Energy security for the future (Additional ROCs information appears below article)
   
Bullet point JANUARY- New Year promises for all (Links to useful websites in text below)


This Christmas, remember the planet

There are many people in the church who seem to run a mile at the mention of 'politics'. Or at least at the mention of some politics. They're quite happy to talk about poverty and homelessness - but mention climate change, and suddenly it's: 'Oo, no, isn't that a bit...' and then in voice that suggests they've just eaten a Murray Mint that tastes like mouldy socks, they say, 'political...?'

I find this particularly strange at Christmas. The time of year when we celebrate the birth of one of the greatest political activists ever to have lived: Jesus.

The man around which the whole of Christianity is based would surely turn on his cloud if he heard a chap in a tweed suit with a blue rinse denouncing the fight against climate injustice as being a bit too... 'political'. Because let's be clear, this Jesus wasn't a chap who sat in an armchair watching X-Factor. In the face of a brutal civil oppression, he taught a message of peace, and where he found poverty and greed he railed against it.

His resistance was non-violent, but far from passive. And wasn't it Jesus who said in the Sermon on the Mount, 'Blessed are the wind turbines'? Okay - so maybe I made that last bit up... but Archbishop Rowan Williams did say tackling climate change was a Christian duty. (In fact it wasn't just him. This October the leaders of the Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, Sikh and Buddhist faiths in Britain issued a joint statement saying that tackling the causes of global warming was 'morally imperative'.)

Christian Aid and CAFOD are both greatly respected Christian charities which have gained mass support for their work to eradicate poverty and suffering. Now, for both of them, climate change is their key campaign. They know that global warming will create more poverty, homelessness and injustice than ever before - that if they don't fight climate change, they might as well give up and go home.

It was fantastic to hear that the Mothers' Union and the WI both planned to be involved in the 350 Day of Climate Action last month. I hope this signals the start of a bigger change across the Island's pews and pulpits.

Christmas is about giving and sharing. About compassion, humility and forgiveness (which is why I haven't given myself the gift of a good old moan about the chairman of the MEA for his failure to do anything significant to reduce our dependence on oil and gas... Oops...!)

So, instead of telling ourselves that we're not convinced by climate change, or that it's not going to affect us, or that we find the 4x4 much more comfortable... perhaps, especially if we have Faith, we should be noticing that climate change is already creating drought and disease and poverty and injustice in the developing world, and that instead of selfishly turning up the heating or gorging on a second turkey, we could do something about it.

We could take personal action by supporting the 10:10 campaign and promising to cut our own CO2 emissions by 10% in 2010. And because, so often, the only thing anyone is waiting for is the support of someone they trust, we could tell our friends that we want to make a difference, and see if they'll join us.

Further afield, we could ask our church, or our school or sports club to sign up to the 10:10 campaign too.

And, perhaps, because it’s Christmas, we could send a card to John Shimmin and Phil Gawne, currently the only MHKs taking climate change seriously, to say 'thanks for trying to make a difference’, and to offer them support. [NB This coloumn was written before Tynwald unanimously agreed their first climate change motion in November - about time - but better late than never.]

Poverty and suffering are political; climate change is political; Christianity was started by a great political activist who saw a better future and wanted humanity to share it.

So, this Christmas - let's make him proud.

To make a difference this Christmas:
* Visit Isle of Man Friends of the Earth and find out more about the 10:10 campaign. www.foe.org.im
* Get involved in The Wave – an event in recognition of the Climate Change Summit in Copenhagen, on
* Donate some cash to Christian Aid, CAFOD, or if you want to keep your cash on the Island, the One World Centre – to help them fight climate change related poverty and suffering.
* If you’ve not finished your Christmas Shopping, then check out the Christmas Shopping suggestions on the FoE website too.


A world of difference

Last month I suggested taking personal action on climate change. This month I want to look at ways the Government could make a difference.

We have a magnificent history of innovation and legislation on the Isle of Man. We’ve got the oldest parliament in the world, we’ve built a finance sector from scratch, and we gave votes to women long before Westminster. But right now we’re missing the boat on climate change.

The richness and diversity of our landscape means that, as a nation, we’re likely to be hit badly by the weather impacts of global warming. Yet we’re failing to invest in the necessary adaptations – meaning we’ll probably have to create new infrastructure in a clumsy rush and at much greater public expense.

We’re also failing to take advantage of the situation. We could benefit from climate change - if only MHKs stopped playing conkers in Tynwald and started doing some work instead.

The Isle of Man is just 30 miles by 15. A small place – but with a strong sense of nationhood, a big ego, and a big impact around the world. We’re the big brother of small states – many of whom continue to look to us for new ideas. We also have a large number of global companies registered here.

At this point it’s worth noticing the elephant in the room. The world is out to get low tax economies, transparent or not, and in all likelihood the boom days of our finance sector have already passed. It’s a big conversation the Government’s scared to have in public, but which is being trailed in whispers around the corridors of power. Most of our eggs are in the financial basket – so big ideas about how to sustain our GDP are needed.

We could become a centre of environmental excellence; we could become a low carbon economy. Our light touch bureaucracy and ability to move legislation quickly (if the mood takes us) mean we could make the most of the fact that the world is in search of new low-carbon ideas, systems and products, which could be born and developed here.

Our landscape and coastline give us the perfect chance to become a leading test-bed for new technologies. By investing in research and by creating financial incentives and an attractive planning system that allows enviro-companies to flourish, we could be living up to our ambitions as a world-class centre of excellence. This would help safeguard our economy and our public services for the future.

Global warming is creating a new industrial revolution. A revolution that’s rushing towards us like an unbroken colt, but if we’re going to find ways of taming it and sticking on a saddle, we’ve got to grab the chance before it bolts and finds greener pastures run by other governments.

In order to be taken seriously as a low-carbon territory however, we have to address the fact that we generate some of the dirtiest power, per capita, in the Western world. Even though Tynwald passed legislation to invest in renewable energy and promote microgeneration in 2006 – it still hasn’t happened. Our electricity is oil and gas generated, and there’s no better way of contributing to future climate chaos. Government is demonstrating its inability to look ahead, to invest sustainably in the future, and to enforce its own policy. It begs the question, what’s the point of Tynwald, when a key statutory body is dragging its heals in such a woeful manner.

Our financial expertise could bring other benefits too. By building straightforward environmental rules into our company registrations we could make a fundamental difference around the world and help redefine our finance sector’s ethical base. Our tax incentives are still attractive, so most companies would comply without second thought.

Agriculture too continues to be a big deal on the Island. Switched-on farmers know crops are more likely to fail due to shifts in harvest patterns and an increase in pests; they know topsoil is being washed away, and that fire will become a greater risk. DAFF has an opportunity to create a centre of farming excellence on the Isle of Man - looking at ways in which agriculture can adapt and thrive in a changed climate.

Beyond that we could be promoting development of electric vehicles, banning plastic bags, and building new flood defences and drainage systems that integrate renewable technologies. We could be learning from our heritage and developing new attractions to show how the lessons of the past can help us build the infrastructure of the future – from waterwheels to coppicing and biofuels.

The opportunities are vast and many, and the alarm clock’s ringing for Tynwald. It’s time MHKs woke up.


The tide is turning

There must have been something in the water. Even my aged aunt, a died-in-the-wool, state-of-the-nation, salt-of-the-earth, Daily-Express-reading sceptic is starting to wonder about climate change and what ordinary people can do about it.

Today I’m looking at two clear actions you can take to tackle global warming.

First of all, please visit the Isle of Man Friends of the Earth website: www.foe.org.im. It’s new, colourful, and there’s a raft of information and links to useful stuff, including the 350 International Day of Climate Action on the 24th October and the 10:10 campaign.

Both campaigns have been launched to draw attention to the UN Climate Conference in Copenhagen this December. Already billed as the most important conference of this generation, it’s also potentially the biggest flop, if binding targets, and the mechanisms to achieve them, aren’t agreed. Work will also be done to agree ways of punishing signatory governments with fines and trade exclusions if they fail to do what they’ve promised.

People who can’t be bothered with climate change often point to China and say, ‘Why should we do anything if they aren’t?’ Aside from the fact that this is bizarre (‘The bear isn’t running away from the dragon so why should I?’), China, India, Russia and the USA are all now committed to the Copenhagen process. China in particular has surprised everyone by making strong commitments in advance of the final talks. It’s also worth mentioning that even though we’re a small state - we’re a big state among small states… a sort of older brother that’s looked up to by a multitude of smaller territories. What we do matters.

So what about these campaigns? The 350 Day of Climate Action is a terribly important event with an unfortunate name. But, forget about the fact that 350 means diddely squat – I’ll explain it in a minute – what’s important is that around the world there are literally thousands of groups raising awareness of climate change on the 24th October. The Isle of Man is no exception. The One World Centre in Castletown (Tel: 825464) is co-ordinating a whole range of activities you can get involved in… for example, 350 drummers will Samba, the Tower of Refuge will be lit with a 350 sign, DAFF are planting 350 trees, the WI are baking 350 cakes, Peel’s cathedral bells will be ring 350 chimes, Morsbags are giving away 350 recycled bags, and there’ll be a three-minute people-freeze in Douglas High street… There’ll also loads more stuff I just haven’t been told about yet. If you fancy getting involved, give Katie at the OWC a call, and check the FoE website for more details.

So why’s it called the 350 Day of Action. Sorry, but here goes: the main climate scientists agree that the safe level of CO2 in our atmosphere is 350 parts per million. Beyond this we’re working our way towards Apocalypse. Fossil fuel burning has led to an unprecedented increase in the levels of CO2 in the air, and surprise surprise, we’re already beyond 350ppm. In fact we’re on track for around 500ppm in the near future. We have to cut emissions back to 350, so that like a sick child, the world can get better again. (It is still possible.)

Raising awareness is a good start. But action to cut emissions is what matters most. If you do nothing else on the 24th October, perhaps you can sign the 10:10 pledge.

This campaign was launched in September to give individuals and companies carbon cutting targets too. Simply - you’re being asked to sign a pledge to cut your emissions by 10% in 2010.

On the next-door island loads of people, including every member of the UK Cabinet have signed the pledge. Camden Council has signed up, so have Royal Mail, Ocado, The Guardian, Co-op, the National Union of Students, as well as a multitude of heritage organisations and smaller companies.

Wouldn’t it be amazing if every Member of Tynwald, and the IoM Post, Manx Telecom, the MEA, Manx National Heritage and the Island’s media outlets all signed it too?

And wouldn’t it be great if you did? I have. My wife and I are already trying to drive less and turn off our computers more. We’re using less water (even cold water needs processing), buying as much local food as we can, and using less heat. They’re small things – but they add up to a big difference. They’ll reduce the CO2 we’re responsible for, and they’ll save cash.

It’s my world and my responsibility – it’s yours too… What are you going to do?


Can the tide create a surge in energy?

The Irish Sea has a pretty enormous tidal swell, which rises and falls reliably twice a day, 365 days a year, so at first glance tidal energy would seem like a great idea. A lot of other folk on the Island think the same, judging by the number of e-mails and conversations I’ve had on the issue in the last month.

Reality on the other hand seems to tell a different story. The technology is still vastly under-developed and generally viewed as being too high a risk for anyone to really take seriously in a commercial environment.

The only substantial example of a tidal power station is in La Rance, built in 1966 by the French energy giant EDF, which was then state-owned and received massive subsidy. La Rance currently produces over 90% of all captured tidal energy in the world. There's another much smaller power station in Nova Scotia, and a couple of tiny ones elsewhere. In Britain we're a long way behind with just a few studies being carried out using single turbines, for example in Strangford Lough.

When you consider the Isle of Man's record in embracing and testing new technologies you'd have to conclude that tidal power is distinctly unlikely until it's so common you can buy a tidal turbine in Tesco. Wind is different. The technology is now so tried and tested and commonplace that you can practically get them with your Clubcard points.

Certainly, wind is the likely short term option on the Island. In April this year, following a campaign by IoM Friends of the Earth, the MEA and DTI acknowledged that wind turbines could easily account for a quarter of the electricity used on the Isle of Man. This would need just 6 to 12 decent size turbines which could be in place in as little as five years.

But there are other options too.

Biomass (from energy crops such as willow) is currently exciting a number of people, not just because it could provide a cheap and relatively carbon neutral energy, but also because it could create a vibrant local energy economy for the Island.

At the moment we're caught in a web of outdated dogma whereby almost all of our energy is shipped in at great expense. Oil and gas don't come cheap and the costs of importing them are likely to rise astronomically over the next 15 years or so as supply levels reduce. You think your electricity bill is high now - just wait! So the need to reconsider our energy provision is urgent – you can't just build a new energy infrastructure over night.

With biomass we get a triple whammy. We develop a degree home grown energy security, we reduce our carbon emissions, and we establish a local industry in growing and processing the fuel in the first place. Rather than sending piles of cash off to the UK, Saudi Arabia and Russia the money stays here and recycles itself around the Island. Many farmers complain that they can’t make a living from food because supermarkets have pushed prices so low – biomass could provide a great new crop for a few of them to diversify into.

Combined heat and power is also something to consider. The Energy from Waste plant (the incinerator) does a good job, when it’s working, of changing plastic waste into electricity, but the opportunity to capture the heat and use it to warm local schools and homes was missed. If we’re going to continue burning some of our rubbish, let’s maximise its full potential for heat and power, like they do now in the rest of Britain.

And finally – microgeneration. This reduces the demand on our Grid and gives small-scale renewable energy producers the chance to earn some cash. The UK has just changed the law so that small energy producers, such as homes, schools and sports clubs, have to be paid around 30p per unit for the energy they sell to the National Grid, meaning their investment will now be paid off in around a third of the time. This is fantastic and will heavily promote microgeneration as an affordable option. Here microgeneration tariffs are only available for home producers (not schools, churches, etc) and the rates are very poor by comparison.

The Government’s Energy Policy Working Group recently commissioned a report into renewable energy options. It was due to be published in the autumn, but has been delayed until next year. The report is likely to flesh out the options I’ve mentioned above, and hopefully come up with a few more.

Then, at last, we might start to see some real progress towards a sustainable energy future.


Separating the rainforest from the trees

There are intelligent ways of offsetting carbon emissions - and then there's planting trees.

Carbon offsetting is important. By investing in a carbon offset scheme people can compensate for releasing CO2 by paying for immediate carbon reductions somewhere else. But when people think of carbon offsetting – tree planting is usually the first bell that rings. Sadly it's pretty much useless.

Now don't get me wrong, there are lots of fantastic reasons for planting trees: restoring ancient woodland, promoting biodiversity, protecting wildlife, stopping soil erosion... all valid and virtuous - but nothing to do with reducing CO2.

Carbon offsetting is about creating a like-for-like trade within a reasonable time frame. If I pay twenty-five quid to offset some emissions from my Vauxhall Corsa and that gets spent on a treadle pump in India meaning a farmer can water his crops more effectively, cheaply and without using a dirty old petrol generator, then that makes a difference immediately. The trade-off is equal and specific. £25 spent on tree planting will take more than a hundred years to absorb the CO2 necessary to offset the emissions I pumped out in just 6 months… that's if all the trees survive… and then when they die… they release all the CO2 again. Pointless.

So let’s be clear - tree planting in Britain is irrelevant to halting climate change. On the other hand saving the rainforests is one of the most important things we could ever do.

I've had lots of letters recently from people wanting more info. Climate knowledge changes weekly so I've been doing some new research. Frankly, it's frightening. A lot of very bright people now believe we've got less than a generation to solve this problem. Within ten or twenty years we’ll reach global tipping points from which there’s no return. The rainforests are a great example.

The rainforests around the earth’s equator are one of the most important ancient ecosystems in the world. They take hundreds, even thousands of years to establish themselves. They absorb around a fifth of the world's annual carbon emissions, yet we're destroying them at an enormous rate (an area the size of a football pitch every 4 seconds). Within another ten years another area the size of Egypt will have been cut down.

It’s madness. We're destroying something that could save us - but even worse - as rainforest is destroyed it releases all the CO2 it's been storing up for centuries, thus greatly speeding climate change.

Worse still, at current logging rates, scientists reckon that within a generation the rainforests will have become too small to support themselves, at which point the remaining woodland will dry out and die.

Saving the rainforest: ancient, dense and massive, is completely different from planting a bit of coppice round the back of a high school, or along the side of the M1 Motorway.

There are other major tipping points as well - all of which we expect to reach before today's babies leave school. None of these tipping points are currently factored into climate modelling, so most government impact predictions are mild to say the least. Some scientists actually believe that while the human population will hit 9bn by 2050, it’ll have collapsed to 1bn by 2100. I think that's stretching a point - but it could certainly happen within the next two to three hundred years if those tipping points are reached. Climate change will lead to floods, famine, war and disease. That's right - it's the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse riding over the hill together.

The Copenhagen Conference is our big chance - possibly the last chance to stop catastrophic climate change. In my wish list for the summit we need large and legally binding emissions cuts. The cost of a carbon tonne must rise dramatically. We need an agreement to save the rainforests, and new legislation to force technological innovation. Back in Britain, planning systems need radical reforms to stop Nimbys halting urgent and essential progress. We need greater investment in renewable technologies. And greenies need to stop moaning about nuclear fusion and clean coal and recognise that beggars can’t be choosers. There’s not a chance of weaning people off a high energy, high consumption lifestyle within the next ten years, so we have to find low carbon ways of generating electricity: right now.

For action you can take, please take a look at the tipping points video linked from my Green page - sign Prince Charles' Rainforests Project pledge - and offset your CO2 emissions responsibly with climatecare.org


Copenhagen

In the battle to reduce CO2 emissions the UK Government has often led the way and the Isle of Man has sadly lagged behind. Indeed there are still those in Tynwald, who either don’t seem to take climate change seriously, or who don’t believe in climate change at all and have actually wasted good money getting staff to try and disprove the theory (as if somehow a lowly civil servant has the capacity to rubbish the independent research and consensus of every climatologist in the world).

There are also a few dinosaurs who like to write into Manx Tails, foaming at the gills – but that doesn’t change the fact that man-made climate change is the single biggest threat facing the world today, both in terms of environmental and economic impact – and that most global decision-makers now take it terribly seriously.

On the other hand, there are those in Tynwald who should be applauded loudly for their efforts to win round half-hearted colleagues. Phil Gawne and John Shimmin are two such men, and David Cretney’s also doing his best.

The TTXGP (the world’s first eco-friendly motorcycle race) was a fantastic success – it shows a real innovative spirit. DLGE’s decision to cover the costs of recharging electric vehicles is a superb incentive to those considering purchasing electric cars and bikes, even if the electricity the MEA is currently providing is about as renewable as a sheet of Kleenex. The DTI’s recent commitment to push for wind farms is excellent news. Phil Gawne’s personal commitment to the Transition Island movement has set a fine example (if only any of his ostrich-like colleagues would care to follow it), and the new eco-friendly DAFF building is exciting too. John Shimmin’s recent attack on the waste created by bottled water was timely and characteristically blunt. The idea that we need to pay to buy water from a shop instead of getting it free from a tap is frankly insane. (Incidentally, I heard recently that students at one of the Douglas high schools have been stopped from refilling their water bottles from drinking fountains on health and safety grounds. Madness! The Director of Health and Safety has assured me that no such grounds exist. Listen up head teacher! Your report card reads: doesn’t pay attention; could do better…)

The environmental progress we’re making on the Isle of Man is the result of dedicated individuals driving policy forward where they can – often despite the hurdles placed in their way by ignorant and ill-informed colleagues.

And sadly, as a nation, we still have next to no strategy for combating climate change, and leadership on the issue is visibly lacking.

I was in London a couple of weeks ago and met Gordon Brown (a much more impressive man in person than he is on TV). I spoke to him about climate change and pressed him to do more. (I’ve previously outlined how the UK is leading on green policy – see ffinlo.org.) He was clear that he would, and that the most important date in the environmental calendar this year is December 7th, the start of the UN Climate Change Summit in Copenhagen. 192 countries will meet in the Danish Capital. It’s a Flash Gordon moment – a chance for politicians to save the world – new binding targets will be agreed to reduce the impact of climate change on humanity.

The Isle of Man will not be attending – so we won’t be able to take part in the negotiations. But if 192 other countries are able to come to an agreement on emissions reductions I hope to goodness that the Isle of Man will have the courage to step up to the plate and agree to enshrine similar commitments into Manx law as well. Those who say ‘the Isle of Man doesn’t really matter – we’re too small,’ are wrong. Thousands of companies from around the world are registered here. We could play a massive part in ensuring their corporate environmental responsibility.

John Shimmin promised me eighteen months ago that we’d have a Climate Change Bill within five years. I’ve yet to see any progress towards this and would suggest that the agreements reached at Copenhagen would provide a great starting point in the drafting. Anyone in Tynwald, looking for a legacy, should recognise the opportunity to make a lasting difference by introducing such a bill.
 
China, India, Europe and the USA are all now fully engaged in the Copenhagen process. There’s every chance that December 2009 will be the month historians look back on and say, ‘that was when the whole world came together to fight for a shared future.’ I hope the Isle of Man is prepared to play its part too.


Let’s take a good look at clean coal

It’s easy to slag things off isn’t it? When someone comes up with an idea that sounds, well, basically daft, the instant response is to scoff and point at the loony. When Alexander Graham Bell first suggested he’d invent a contraption to talk to someone in Australia his mates probably guffawed heartily. The same was no doubt true for the inventors of aeroplanes, electric bulbs, and goodness knows, even Pot Noodle.

Well it may come as a surprise to many, but environmentalists are humans too and have a tendency to stick with tried and tested solutions instead of opening their minds.

Behind the recent UK Budget’s ‘hell-in-a-handcart’ headlines, most of which focused on the abnormal size of Mr Darling’s deficit, there was good news too. Firstly, the Chancellor announced the world’s first carbon budget, committing Britain to a legally binding 34% reduction in CO2 levels by 2022. Secondly, £5bn was allocated for investment in green technologies. Part of that £5bn will be for new ‘clean coal’ technology.

Hang on – coal that doesn’t emit carbon? What nonsense! At least that’s what lots of greenies think. But, reaching a 34% cut in just 13 years is massive. We’re not going to get there by just recycling our coke cans and hoping that wind will power the future.

Now don’t get me wrong - wind farms, tidal power and recycling are part of the solution, but our whole way of life produces CO2. Climate chaos is now so imminent and urgent that we have to start making hard radical choices and get on with implementing them.

The UK Government’s recognised this. We need electricity – and yet a complicated and possibly over-democratic planning system mean wind farms are a slow-moving solution (thanks to ridiculous Nimbys who’d rather lose the planet than their view). One nuclear power station will supply the energy of a hundred wind farms. It’ll also mean winning one planning fight rather than a hundred. In some cases reconditioning an existing plant will mean no planning battle at all.

Coal too requires fewer planning battles – and we still have lots of it, despite the mothballing of many coalfields in the eighties. But there’s another advantage to developing clean coal as well. Just as the industrial revolution created earning potential – climate change presents similar opportunities. Whoever invents in the best solutions will win the biggest rewards. Governments who provide incentives for eco-research and development are more likely to benefit from the jobs and tax revenues they create.

The concept of clean coal centres on the ability to capture CO2 as the coal is burned. The carbon is then pumped along pipelines to old oil and gas fields, like those in the North Sea, where it’s pressed and locked into the pores of dense rocks. Many ecologists are scared because carbon-capture technology is new and might not work. Sadly, that attitude would have left mankind in the Dark Ages, with neither telephones nor Pot Noodles. Scientists may fail – but they probably won’t – even if it takes a few goes to get it right.

Quite apart from that, other countries have loads of coal, which they fully intend to keep using. China’s still opening two coal-fired power stations a week. If Britain can develop new technology to capture the carbon, to help avoid climate catastrophe, and earn a wadge of cash by flogging it to the Chinese… surely it’s a no brainer!? Crack on!

It’s easy to stick with what we know. Nuclear power was vastly unstable in the 60s and 70s – but clever people think it’s worth looking at again now because technology’s changing from fission to fusion and because circumstances demand it. There’s still a huge problem with waste, but fusion, if it can be achieved, would produce less – and sometimes we need to implement the least worst option. We aren’t going to pull the plug on electricity – so we need low-carbon ways of producing it.

Now, I know this column has focussed on UK solutions. I’d love to write something supporting the big ideas of Tynwald – but sadly there aren’t any. The one big idea our Government’s managed to have in the last 50 years was the finance sector. As ideas go it seems to have been reasonably successful, but clearly having it was exhausting and we’ve not had one since.

But our finance sector could be modernised, and along with our tax laws used to attract low-carbon research and development too. This could help create Manx independence and security for the next century. And frankly, that’s not even a big idea… we just need someone to have it.


Britain is not awash with asylum seekers

First off, are other people fed up with the road works this winter...? They’re everywhere! You just can’t move anymore. I passed four lots on the way to Douglas from Ballasalla last week, and the road past the airport’s been a nightmare for more than a year!

I reckon the Transport Minister must have had a bang on the head. How else can you explain this sudden obsessive behaviour? He’s like a Tourettes sufferer, but with him, every time he gets a nervous twitch he signs another order to dig up a road.

It would be glib and easy for me to suggest that if Government weren’t spending so much on road works then it might be able to spend more on public transport (or perhaps honour its commitment to public sector pensions…), so I won’t. But, well… it could, couldn’t it...? And when most cars on the Island now seem to be glossy urban 4x4s, most of which have never been off-road in their lives, why shouldn’t we leave a few bumps in the highway anyway…?

I’ll leave that thought at the traffic lights, and move on from ecology to ethics.

I came across a couple of guys the other day who were convinced that every problem in Britain was down to asylum seekers. They believed asylum seekers got a free home, DVD player and a fitted kitchen as soon as they arrived – and they felt Nick Griffin, the leader of the BNP, was the only politician who truly understood the problems of modern Britain. They were deeply upset that the BNP didn't get the same level of respect that the Scottish, Welsh or Manx nationalists receive. Well, here's a clue: the BNP is racist. You don't have to be racist to be proud of your country – a point reiterated recently by the Archbishop of York.

When I stood for the UK Parliament in 2005 I spoke to an alarming number of people who were rejecting the traditional political parties and turning to the BNP or UK Independence Party. It was alarming because most of what these people told me on the doorstep was nonsense based on propaganda, sloppy journalism, and fear. In 2005 things were pretty good - the boom years were still with us. Now things are more difficult and people are looking for someone to blame. The BNP thrives in this atmosphere: they tell us that if only Britain closed its borders we'd never be in this mess.

Part of the problem is that people confuse terms. ‘Asylum seekers’ are those desperately seeking a safe haven from persecution. Most claiming asylum begin their lives in Britain in draconian holding centres where they stay for months, or even years. A large number are refused entry, and returned to their country of origin. (More info at http://www.refugeecouncil.org.uk)

As a rich nation Britain is more than capable of absorbing its share of those in fear of illegal imprisonment, rape, torture or murder in their own countries. UNHCR statistics show that because the UK asylum system is now so tough, applications fell by around three quarters in the five years up to 2006. Additionally, since 2005 refugees only get permission to remain in Britain for 5 years. Most of the world’s refugees still live in poor countries.

‘Economic migration’ is different. Many people want to work and live in a country other than their own. And thank goodness. A recent study by the IPPR (a UK think-tank - http://www.ippr.org.uk) shows that 6 million Brits now live overseas – 10% of the population – and, of course, those skilled workers need replacing. The NHS in the UK (and on the Isle of Man for that matter) depends on migrant workers to provide the range of necessary skills. The hospitality industry would sink without immigration… and in fact, most professions in Britain rely on skilled foreign labour to one extent or another.

I asked these guys in the pub where they came from? Liverpool and Birmingham. They'd been here for 20 years. 'So you're immigrants too?' I suggested. They were appalled at the idea. Completely different they said. Why? Their answer was, essentially, because they weren't black.

Economic migration is essential to every nation. The Island thrives on imported skills (which is one reason I feel the reported clamp-down by the Work Permit Committee is ill-advised).

Sadly, this debate is fuelled by fear and misinformation. Clumsy newspaper commentary aimed at some of the world's most vulnerable people is a cheap shot. I was saddened to read Stu Peters recent anti-asylum seeker comments in the Manx Independent. Britain is no more awash with asylum seekers than it is in danger from Martian invasion.

And now, a final thought. Many people read this column because I regularly castigate global warming non-believers. I wouldn’t want to disappoint them this month. So - If you think man-made climate change is a green conspiracy - you're bonkers. Nuff said.


Could carbon rationing be the answer?

If there’s something unpleasant to do there’s a tendency to put it off isn’t there? Filling in your tax return, mowing the lawn, arranging a meeting you don’t want to have… But eventually those things still have to be done.

Dealing with climate change is like that too. Most of us have put the snooze button down on the issue for a long time, but at some point we’ll have to get up and start wearing the hair shirt. Personal carbon allowances may force us to do that.

Evidence of the pace of climate change is ever more frightening. Prince Charles recently said we have to tackle it now – despite the global recession. He reckons we have about 100 months to save the world from irreversible climate change. It’s now considered impossible to avoid a 2-degree rise in global temperatures and a 4-degree rise is likely. Both will result in widespread catastrophe, and create a huge number of climate refugees before 2050. The need to change the way we live is immediate and urgent.

On the Isle of Man there are good people in Government who’re brutally aware of the need to develop alternatives to burning fossil fuels – but there are others who still think global warming is some sort of conspiracy. It’s worth pointing out, again, that 99% of the world’s scientists agree that climate change is man-made and that we can still limit the most devastating impacts. The big problem is the media. Almost half the world’s journalists seem to think they understand global warming better than the collective brain of the scientists who’ve actually studied it - and many of us are quite happy to trust the editorials: because it’s easier, more comfortable, and means we can keep destroying our habitat with impunity.

Of course, there are people already trying to reduce their carbon impact. Others would if the people across the street did – but ‘til the neighbours get rid of the urban-4x4 they’re not going to either. There are also loads of people who simply don’t care. It’ll take more than a few activists to save our species – society as a whole needs to be forced into action.

So here’s the problem. In a democracy a national government needs public support, and most people still won’t accept the kind of policies necessary to protect our future. If any government were to independently take a radical step to reduce emissions the press would be outraged and the general public would kick that government out at the next opportunity. For most countries therefore cross-party agreements and global treaties are very important.

So far the big global idea for tackling climate change has been carbon trading – setting a price for carbon, regulating the amount of CO2 that can be produced, and then allowing nations to trade it among themselves.

The next step is for individuals to have carbon allowances – and in my view – the sooner the better. The UK’s cross-party Energy Committee believes we’ll have person carbon allowances (PCAs) within eight years. Fantastic - but how would they work?

PCAs will be a bit like wartime rationing. Each year your carbon allowance will be issued on a credit card, and then every time you buy petrol, or pay the gas bill or electricity bill, credits would be deducted. When you’ve used them up… that’s it… for the year… unless you buy additional credits from people who haven’t used all of theirs. It rewards low energy use, and penalises over use. The system would be mandatory, and credits would be tradable like money. The number of credits you get will reduce significantly each year.

PCAs will force governments and companies to promote and innovate new low-carbon technologies; it’ll also force individuals to use less energy.

Scientists and many politicians agree that the effects of global warming will be as serious as a world war – dealing with it will require serious personal and community sacrifices. Politicians around the world have been horrified by the data on climate change (my contacts in London tell me of ‘panic’ in some parts of Whitehall), but they’re also scared of the electoral consequences of action. Despite this fear, it’s pretty certain that personal carbon allowances will be here long before today’s babies start high school.

On a lighter and different note – Craig Bell of Flint and Ember wants to start producing eco-friendly wood-chip logs for people to use on their solid fuel burners. They’re 100% renewable, and carbon neutral because they only release carbon that was absorbed when the wood was growing. They burn at 3 times the heat for 3 times as long. Craig would like people to get in touch if they want a sample – to see if there’s enough demand. His number is 317 848.


Snow, waste and ManxTube

We've had snow - Hooray! I went walking in a perfect winter wonderland at South Barrule plantation - where I built a snowman and met a three-legged dog called Elvis - and I climbed up Cronk ny Arrey Laa by snow lit moonlight - and it was glorious. Across in the UK they were even luckier - with some places in Scotland getting up to three feet of the white stuff in the space of a week. The last time I saw snow like that was in the late eighties when I still had my paper round and got a few extra quid digging out cars that were daft enough to leave their garages...

But hang on. According to some: this is evidence that talk of global warming is clap trap. Let's try and dispel that myth.

Firstly, it's worth pointing out that there's a big difference between climate and weather. The climate continues warming significantly even if there are a few falls of snow in Britain. According to a recent David Attenborough film about the Arctic melt, 400,000 fewer square miles of ocean at the North Pole remained frozen last summer. So, let's not get excited.

There's another thing though. Surely I'm not the only person to have noticed the rain and greyness of the last few years. Either I've become manic-depressive or there's been some filthy weather recently - exactly as climatologists predicted. The summertime has come mostly in April and May, then it's clouded over in June and the murk of the rest of the year has been punctuated with just a few brief sunny spells (let’s hope to goodness it’s better this year). The last few months in particular have given us a surfeit of cloud, rain, drizzle, and more cloud. In the UK there's been very serious flooding for both of the last summers, and as any farmer will attest our 2008 harvest was an utter washout. Note the common theme here: rain. In the summer it's warm: so the rain is wet. We shouldn't be surprised if in the winter when it's cold: the rain is frozen. And we're likely to get more of it rather than less as the next few years pass. In days gone by we'd have seen more fine days of hoar frost. Now we're getting winter murk, and rain, and snow.

RECYCLING NEWS
I read a headline in the Telegraph recently that suggested all our recycling is being dumped and stockpiled as a result of the economic downturn. It’s a shame that newspapers have to sell themselves with scare stories, but it's the world we live in. A Radio 4 investigation discovered that this wasn't even true in the UK. On the Isle of Man it's absolutely false. DLGE have assured me that all of our recycling routes are safe and robust: some of our recycling is processed here on the Isle of Man - glass for example is turned into Eco-sand at Ballaharra, and the rest goes into various recycling streams that are fully reprocessed in the UK itself - nothing is getting shipped off to China, and it never was. Go to the DLGE website and click the News tab for full details – and check out my space on ManxTube. What’s that? See below.

MANXTUBE
Here’s a bit of fun. Have you noticed how teenagers seem to wave their mobile phones at each other a lot these days? Apparently they’re videoing themselves - digitally recording things that in the old days they’d have had to store in their brains instead of on a memory card.

Well, I've been bitten by the same bug, and in an effort to share some green thoughts with technophiles I started a video-blog on YouTube, the global video-sharing website… Imagine my delight therefore when I received news of ManxTube - a brand new site – just for us Manxies. Each Green Column will now be supplemented with one or two short films - which you can link to from ffinlo.org. Please take a look – and encourage the kids you know to take a look too. Beyond that - why not suggest they start making their own green films to share? At 36 I'm positively crusty, so it'd be great to get green films made by green kids to be watched by other kids on ManxTube and YouTube.


Energy security for the future
(Renewable Obligations Certificates - ROCs info below article)

Following the publication of last month’s Green Column I received a phone call from Quintin Gill, the MEA Chair. I’d suggested a New Year resolution for him – to recognise the urgency of climate change and to agree that there was some money to be made from wind energy. He thought I was misleading the public by linking wind energy sales to the current economic situation.

Mr Gill’s quite right that wind energy isn’t a quick fix. But with the right strategy and a bit of willpower we could see wind farms on and off-shore putting Manx energy into the Manx grid. We could also see turbines earning money – because we sell surplus energy forward to the UK – at a premium.

Since we spoke Port St Mary lighthouse has been washed away by a storm on a spring tide – another portent for the future.

Mr Gill has agreed to be interviewed for a Manx Radio Perspective programme on energy security, to be broadcast in early March. The timing is scheduled to follow the February board meeting of the MEA where, I’m told, they’ll at last agree a position on renewable energy. I’m reliably informed this could have happened a year ago, but decisions were postponed.

There are two massive reasons to invest now in renewable energy. Two years ago the Stern Report suggested that adapting infrastructure to face climate change would cost each nation 1% of GDP. But Stern also said that if we left it until the impacts were more keenly felt the cost could rise to 10%. The other reason is peak oil: the point when oil demand outstrips supply – when it will become scarce and very expensive. This issue is currently concerning me most.

The International Energy Authority (IEA) is the organisation that analyses global energy supply and demand. Governments around the world listen and act on the IEA’s predictions. Until recently the IEA has poo-pooed the peak oil problem, saying it’s not something to worry about yet. In December 2008 they changed their minds. Their chief economist is now on record saying that peak oil will be here in 2020. The IEA has also said it will take up to 20 years to adapt.

Most countries in Europe have been developing renewable energy policies for ten years. We haven’t started. Mr Gill told me that specific UK government investment has allowed UK energy companies to invest in renewable technologies. We don’t have access to this funding (the ROCs scheme), which, he says, is one reason why wind energy isn’t properly viable here.

Bearing in mind the figures from the Stern report I’d suggest that investing in renewable technology now would be cheaper for the government, the taxpayer and the consumer in the long run. If we wait another ten years we’ll find ourselves paying exorbitant prices for oil because we’ve failed to make arrangements for a situation we know is coming.

Investment in renewable technologies is no longer some hippy bandwagon to jump on – it’s about protecting our economic future, our energy security, and those on low (and medium) incomes who simply won’t be able to afford to heat themselves in winter unless we invest in alternatives to fossil fuels. World supplies of both oil and gas are controlled by a small number of powerful (and often unstable) nations. Arguably we’ve already seen wars fought over fuel resources – from Iraq to Georgia.

In my view we need strong leadership to ensure our future energy security. That means taking progressive decisions and winning the support of the general public. That’s politics. As a small Island (geographically speaking) with a lot of wind and sea and a relatively small population, we could get the majority of our energy from renewable sources. We could achieve this within a few years if we take the decision to invest now. In 2020 I hope to be able to look back and applaud Mr Gill’s bold forward thinking.

In my radio programme I’ll ask the MEA Chair to explain the company’s position on energy security and renewable technology. I’ll also speak to renewables experts and ask them to explain why they think they have the answers. In this column I can give you my thoughts as an informed commentator – in Perspective you’ll hear the voices of experts as I investigate this important issue further.

On a lighter note - Christine Baker was the Green Column Sefton Competition winner. Congratulations to her. She and her husband have now thoroughly enjoyed their slap-up prize!

* * * * *

What is ROCs?
(From the UK Ofgem website and Wikipedia - links below)

The Renewables Obligation is the main support scheme for renewable electricity projects in the UK. It places an obligation on UK suppliers of electricity to source an increasing proportion of their electricity from renewable sources.

A Renewables Obligation Certificate (ROC) is a green certificate issued to an accredited generator for eligible renewable electricity generated within the United Kingdom and supplied to customers within the United Kingdom by a licensed electricity supplier. One ROC is issued for each megawatt hour (MWh) of eligible renewable output generated.

The RO places an obligation on licensed electricity suppliers in the United Kingdom to source an increasing proportion of electricity from renewable sources. (In 2006/07 it was 6.7% and will rise to 10.4% by the period 2011-12, then by 1% annually for the five years following.)

Suppliers meet their obligations by presenting sufficient Renewables Obligation Certificates (ROCs). Where suppliers do not have sufficient ROCs to meet their obligations, they must pay an equivalent amount into a fund, the proceeds of which are paid back on a pro-rated basis to those suppliers that have presented ROCs.  The Government intends that suppliers will be subject to a renewables obligation until 31 March 2027.

Ofgem link - click here
Wikipedia link - click here


New Year promises for all

Last January I accused the chief minister of not taking climate change seriously. I suggested he should turn over a new leaf, and face the facts. (The column became a radio show, which later bagged Manx Radio a Finalist Award Winner prize at the radio ‘Oscars’ in New York.) I’m pleased to see the New Year resolution was taken seriously, and we now have a Security of Energy and Climate Change Team in government. Nice one! How about a New Year resolution for 2009: create a climate change minister! The problem is serious – it’s getting worse – and we need solutions today rather than tomorrow.

But I shouldn’t just pick on our Tony. What about everyone else? And how about some resolutions for other Ministers?

DAFF Minister, Phil Gawne, for example, recently told the Manx Wildlife Trust that he’d like the Isle of Man to sign up the Rio Convention of Biological Diversity (the most important international biodiversity treaty in the world, signed by 191 nations – but not us). Fabulous. But words are easy. Why not resolve to actually do it in 2009?

And what of DLGE Minister, John Shimmin? He recently held the first stage of a planning consultation aimed at performing major surgery on our planning system. Before the second stage appears, why not resolve to include a new clause which says that the environmental impact of any development will be considered at the planning stages, and that a development levy will be applied to all developments to help fund essential work to preserve biodiversity?

Now then, Treasury Minister, Allan Bell, is in a pickle over finance as the global economy crashes and burns. He could do much worse than to start looking at green taxes (of which we have almost none), which could help to fill the financial void – without having to cut services – and at the same time do some real ecological good.

The MEA Chair is Quintin Gill. He could resolve to start seeing climate change as a pressing issue and to look at ways of earning some much needed cash for the Isle of Man by developing offshore wind farms and selling the extra energy (of which there should be lots!) to the UK. Now there’s a good wheeze!

Finally, the DoT Minister, David Anderson, could make a New Year’s resolution to start looking seriously at promoting and rewarding non-car transport. What about congestion charging, cycle routes, and car sharing lanes? Just because London’s loosing its green shine since Boris came along, doesn’t mean that Douglas can’t get one…

So, let’s leave the ministers there – and have a look at Local Authorities… because they could achieve much of the work that needs to be done on the Isle of Man. Transition Island and Isle of Man Friends of the Earth have loads of ideas about local action – from small things like creating allotments, to bigger things like encouraging applications for home wind turbines, and even bigger things – like LAs getting their own turbines and starting to control their own energy production… At the very least they should have an environmental action plan – and I’d love to hear from any LAs that have started to turn an interest in ecology into a proper on-paper strategy.

Well – that’s government sorted – but what about the rest of us? Here are some suggestions:

Do you really need that extra packaging – if not, then don’t take it.

Do you need the washing machine every day – surely your laundry can build up a bit?

Why not resolve to take the bus at least once a week?
(Visit website - http://www.iombusandrail.info)

Can you resolve to recycle something new?
(Visit website - http://www.gov.im/dlge/waste)

And what about reusing bread bags as sandwich wrappers, getting reusable shopping bags, or considering second hand clothes instead of always buying new?

And, finally, why not resolve to cut your use of plastic drinks bottles…? Buy a bottle and refill it with perfectly good tap water instead.

There we are – between us we’ve saved the world. And it’s only January. Happy 2009!


For 2008 columns - click here
Back to Green Pages




Costain Communications
C O S T A I N     C O M M U N I C A T I O N S
L O C A T E D   I N   T H E   U K   A N D   T H E   I S L E   O F   M A N
+ 4 4   ( 0 )   7 9 2 0   8 5 4   9 0 4         F F I N L O @ C O S T A I N C O M M U N I C A T I O N S . C O M